Clinical notes & scribesPractitioner report

AI scribes for dental chart notes: dentists say templates first

On r/Dentistry, the most specific praise for AI scribes came from people whose scribe fills in their own note templates, and a Tennessee dentist told a dental podcast the same tool cut his note time. The trouble came from open-bay microphones, record-upload-paste workflows, tools that degraded, and AI-drafted notes that had to be retyped. A King's College London study adds that clinicians should check every transcript.

Practice
Several dentists + 1 named
Size
Not stated
Location
Mostly unstated (TN, UK)
Tool
Overjet, Kiroku, Freed, others
Cost
Not disclosed (lists vary)
Source
Practitioner report

Did it work? Results

Who tried it, and why

Anonymous commenters in r/Dentistry threads (most describe themselves as dentists or clinical staff), plus one named Tennessee dentist interviewed on a dental podcast. Practice sizes not stated. Mostly not stated. Dr. Damron is in Tennessee, one thread was started by a UK dentist, and several of the tools price mainly in pounds..

In an October 2026 r/Dentistry thread, a dentist said their office was considering Pearl for chart notes so the doctors wouldn't have to stay after work finishing them. Evenings already go to treatment planning and to emails for patients and specialists on large cases, and some assistants write poor notes. The rep said every operatory would get its own microphone and the AI would write the clinical note. This dentist likes their own detailed templates, which are usually quick, but sometimes stays an extra hour after a day of consults or large treatments. They couldn't find reviews online. Replies in this thread and in an August 2026 thread split sharply. One dentist said a templated note takes them under a minute, another said auto notes in the PMS are already quick, and a third asked why an assistant couldn't take the notes. Others said a scribe that fills in their templates had saved them real time.

What did they set up?

Tools used

What did it cost?

None of the commenters said what they pay. List prices checked on 2026-10-20 (per clinician unless noted): Freed advertises plans 'starting at $39/mo', and its entry plan is capped at 40 notes a month. Its comparison table ticks 'Organization-wide BAA' for the Premier and custom-priced Groups plans, not Starter/Core. DigitalTCO lists $120/month in the US (£99 + VAT in the UK). Kiroku's pricing page shows only pounds and Australian dollars (£26.99 to £89.99 a month), and its US page says letters come with the Pro plan. Dentistry Dashboard AI Dental Notes is £40.99/month per dentist in the UK; it links to a US pricing page we didn't check. Plaud's NotePin recorder is $159. Its healthcare page lists a free starter plan with 300 transcription minutes a month, plus larger plans priced elsewhere. Overjet Voice pricing isn't published. In a May 2026 episode, podcast host Dr. Alan Mead explains why compliant AI scribing software carries a premium price: the vendor signs a BAA, which carries legal liability, and has to delete data promptly (per the show notes). Disclosure: the January 2025 podcast episode where Dr. Giles Damron introduced Freed listed his promo code DrDamron50 ($50 coupon) next to a tracked link (getfreed.sjv.io). The July 2026 episode carried the podcast's own code VERYDENTAL (50% off the first three months).

“Templates where the AI just filled in blanks worked better for me”
Commenter in the r/Dentistry thread "AI for chart notes," October 2026

What didn't go well?

What should your office take from this?

Try it yourself

Turn your note template into scribe instructions
I'm a dentist setting up an AI scribe. Below is one of my existing chart-note templates (for example: limited exam, new-patient exam, or consult). It contains no patient information.

Rewrite it as instructions for an AI scribe that will listen to the appointment and fill in this template. Follow these rules:
1. Keep my headings, their order and my wording exactly. Do not add or remove sections.
2. Under each blank, say in plain words what the scribe should listen for.
3. If something was not said out loud during the visit, the scribe must write [NOT DISCUSSED]. It must never guess or insert a 'normal' default.
4. Tooth numbers, surfaces, quadrants, perio readings, medications and doses are written only exactly as heard. If anything is unclear, write [CHECK].
5. End every note with: 'Draft - reviewed, edited and signed by Dr. ____'.

Then list the 5 places in my template where an AI scribe is most likely to make a mistake, so I know what to check first when I review each note.

[Paste your template here]

Prompt written by us, not by the practice. Never paste names, dates of birth or other patient details into a general AI tool.

Sources

How we checked this

Checked on 20 October 2026. We read all 24 sources listed above, and a second, independent check re-opened every one of them before publication. Anything we could not confirm was removed.

Forum posts that require a login were read through a public archive of the original posts.

Spotted an error? Tell us and we will re-check it. How we verify.

Get one real case study a week

More case studies

Clinical notes & scribesMixed

Voice perio charting at Heartland Dental: what a 27-office Bola AI pilot reported

Bola AI ran a three-month pilot of its voice perio charting in 27 Heartland Dental-supported offices and reports that hygienists saved about 18.5 minutes a day and needed much less help from assistants. Offices that got set up quickly used it far more, and hygienists online describe reliability as mixed.

Bola's case study reports that hygienists saved an average of 18.5 minutes per day. The study says this figure assumes an even mix of new and re-care patients. Our reading is that it is partly an estimate, not a straight stopwatch measurement.
Front desk & phonesVendor-reported

AI receptionist for overflow and after-hours calls: Wolfe Dental's results

A two-office practice in the Portland area with one receptionist per office let Arini's AI take overflow and after-hours calls. Arini reports missed calls fell from as many as 500 to about 50 a month and $134k in booked production over eight months, but it gives no price.

Arini reports the AI answered an average of about 500 overflow and after-hours calls a month that had previously gone to voicemail.
Front desk & phonesMixed

AI receptionist audit: LA dental office's 15-month call log shows 41% task completion

A part-time staff member at an Open Dental practice near Los Angeles read every failed call from 15 months of an AI receptionist. It finished 263 of the 637 calls where someone wanted something done, never put a caller through to a person, and had trouble with Spanish and with spelling names. The author later built a competing product, so weigh the comparisons with that in mind.

Completion rate: of the 637 calls where the caller wanted something done, the AI completed 263 (41%). The 263 includes 76 calls where it only took a message and 45 information-only calls. Actual bookings, reschedules and cancellations made on the call totalled 142, about 22% of the 637 (our arithmetic from the author's table).