Home / Tools
From the case studies

What the case studies report about Pearl Second Opinion

This page only repeats lines from verified cases that name Pearl Second Opinion. It adds no price, rating or result of its own. 1 case study.

Pearl's X-ray AI at Blue Court Dental: what the vendor reports

Vendor-reported · Checked 22 October 2026

How the case names it:

  • Pearl Second Opinion (AI review of dental X-rays)

Result lines that name it

  • Pearl's case study says that from October 2024 to January 2025, across 145 X-rays from 35 patients, Pearl identified 44 early carious lesions.
    Source
  • Pearl's case study says the dentists had spotted 12 of those 44 lesions with traditional methods, and that the AI caught 32 lesions that might have been missed.
    Source
  • Pearl's case study calls those 32 lesions a 73% detection rate. It does not define that rate against a reference standard.
    Source
  • Pearl's case study says nine of those missed lesions required immediate reassessment and restoration.
    Source
  • Pearl's case study quotes Dr. Dixit that Pearl has sped up the diagnosis process a lot. It gives no minutes saved.
    Source
  • Pearl's case study says sales of fluoridated mouthwashes, specialized floss, and regular hygiene maintenance appointments increased. It gives no counts.
    Source

What the case says did not go well

  • Every count is published by Pearl. The page does not show the 145 X-rays or say who marked the "traditional" findings, or whether they were marked before the AI was shown.
  • The practice website, read on 2026-10-22, does not mention Pearl. It says Blue Court Dental Centre in Harrow was established in April 2000 by Dr Nishan Dixit. Pearl's page says "25+ years" of experience. Those two descriptions are not the same wording.
Free assessment. Tell us what takes the most time in your office. We will reply with what we would automate first.Get a free assessment →